NorthAmerica has been dominated by Boeing for a long time, with the majority of its revenues coming from the US (44.2%) alone, whereas its counterpart earns just 17.5% of revenues from North America. Europe to Airbus is what the US is to Boeing. European revenue contribution for Airbus (27.9%) is more than double compared to WithAirbus and Boeing being such dominant forces in the commercial aviation industry, comparisons between the two manufacturers are inevitable. Airbus A320, Airbus A330, Airbus A340, Airbus TheA320 MAY come out better than the 737-200, but may not even come close to the efficiency of a 737-900. If you visit each manufacturer’s Web site, you could check the specifications for the various models, do some math and figure out which ones are more efficient. planeaholic July 27, 2006, 11:50pm #4. Yeah, there are a lot of variables Yeah I like Airbus' naming convention better than Boeing's chronological system. I don't think anyone really cares about when the original model was introduced compared to the type of plane that it is. Maybe after they run out of Whichis better ? Airbus A320 neo or Boeing 737-8 max. Airbus A320neo The A320neo (new engine option) is one of many upgrades introduced by Airbus to help m 737700: 141. A320: 168. 738: 186. SAS reports a mere 0.001 difference in fuel burn per seat per kilometer in litres in favor of Boeing in each case–despite the 738 having 18 more seats, in which case the difference could be expected to be much greater. We found the data to be quite illuminating. AirbusA320neo vs. Boeing 737-800. Values may not be 100% accurate. Engine thrust, MTOW and range (full load) based on best options available. Passanger capacity in standard 3-class layout for widebodies and 2-class for narrowbodies (including A300, A310). Weare not convinced that a small number of extra passengers (seven) would beat out the better range of the 737 MAX 7. Winner: Boeing 737 MAX 7. Airbus A321neo. Airbus A320neo vs. Boeing 737 Lr8U9v.